I hold pacifist principles. I believe in trying to solve our differences without recourse to violence if we can. But so help me, if a foreign army invaded my country I would fight tooth and nail to protect it. And I would have right - and the law - on my side. Under International Law, every citizen has the right to fight an occupying army in defence of their country.
Yo! Blair might believe this - provided the occupying army isn't militarily 'superior' to ours. In that case, I suspect he would simply roll over. He would probably be a collaborator. Can we really conceive of a situation where Blair would stand up to the likes of Bush?
Yo! Blair is a lawyer. He knows every man in the world has the legal right to fight an occupying army. You wouldn't think it, however, to judge from his language describing those Iraqis who fought the invading British and American armies. They are not exercising their right to resist foreign occupation, they are "insurgents".
One could argue that since the Iraqi elections at the end of last year, the occupying armies in question are there at the invitation of the Iraqi government. Fine - if you believe elections can be free and fair under foreign occupation. But even so, everyone arrested before then is simply not guilty of any crime.
Either Blair doesn't believe we, as citizens, have this right, or he is simply such a coward that he will only bully the little guys - and never stand up to the big boys. If previous Prime Ministers thought like that, we could never have fought off Nazism; Germany, after all, were clearly winning WWII up till 1942.
Whatever his reasons for "rewriting" International Law like this, God help us if we are ever under attack on his watch.
